BRICS from below: counterpower movements in Brazil, India and South Africa
Published on ZNet (first on open democracy), by Patrick Heller, May 2, 2015.
Much has been made of the recent wave of social movements against neo-liberalism and precarity. From the Arab Spring to the Occupy movements to the student protests against the educational system in Chile, commentators have detected a Polanyi-like wave of counter movements to neo-liberal globalization. But what exactly do these movements have in common?
The movements themselves are not specifically connected, are clearly rooted in domestic political fields, and have mobilized claims and framed grievances that are as diverse as they are localized. As the literature on moral economies has long argued, people don’t rise up against economic hardship but rather against injustice.
So, if there is clearly no mechanical logic that impels people to protest when economic conditions are tough, can we speak of a global counter-movement to neo-liberalism? Yes, but only if we can clearly identify the links between the politics of movements and the political conditions they respond to and specifically to the crises of legitimacy that drive contentious movements.
Counterpower movements:
Recent protest waves in Brazil, India and South Africa reveal clear patterns of what can be called counterpower movements, movements that explicitly challenge the instrumentalization of political power. The wave of protests that erupted in the run-up to the World Cup in Brazil, the “anti-corruption” movement in India and the spread of “service-delivery protests” in South Africa took varied forms and have traveled different paths, but have three defining characteristics.
First, all three movements erupted in highly consolidated democracies where the procedural dimensions of democracy enjoy widespread support. These movements cannot as such be confused with movements against authoritarian regimes. Second, all three are attacks against perceived injustices and in particular elite usurpation of the state. Third, all three have clearly articulated critiques of institutionalized political society and seek to mobilize civil society as a form of counterpower.
The oligarchialization of power: … //
… South Africa: … //
… India: … //
… Brazil: … //
… A flourishing democrazy:
What lessons can we draw from these three different protest movements? First, for all the talk of how neo-liberalism has hollowed out democracy or pacified civil society, these movements remind us that wherever basic democratic freedoms can be accessed, the possibility for counter-hegemonic politics remains very real.
Second, as much as recent social gains in development in Latin America have been linked to the electoral success of left-of-centre programmatic parties, it is important not to confuse necessary with sufficient conditions. The ANC in South Africa has been an extraordinary disappointment on the social front and in its determination to maintain control has been more than willing to compromise democratic principles. The PT in Brazil has remained much closer to its traditional redistributive politics, but its tenure in power has shifted the balance from the mobilizational to the organizational wing of the party.
In India, the anti-corruption movement dealt what in retrospect may have been the fatal blow – massive electoral repudiation in the 2014 national elections – to a Congress party that long represented itself as the party of the people but degenerated into a rent-seeking cabal. Whether the political scaling-up of the movement into a political formation will produce a permanent electoral shift remains to be seen. But the movement has demonstrated the capacity of civil society to stand up to the implacable forces of political domination that have slowly been subverting democratic life in India.
Third, while all three movements have been fueled by unrealized socio-economic expectations that accompanied democratic transitions in Brazil and South Africa and explosive growth in India, what they have most in common is a rejection of the increasing nexus of political and economic power and the subordination of democracy to money.
Democracy is always messy, always in flux and always constrained. But it is nothing if it cannot block the translation of economic power into political power. In this respect, a permanently organized counterpower is a necessary condition for a flourishing democracy.
Links:
Iceland Pirate Party popularity doubles over 2 months, rivals to ruling parties combined, on Russia Today RT, May 2, 2015 (Website Piratar.is in icelandic, do. in english - see also press Release: Pirates entering Reykjavik Citi Council, on Piratar.is/english, June 1, 2014);
The Limits of Propaganda, on Reseau International.net, by Dimitry Orlov, May 1, 2015;
I’m building a Windows 10 robot this weekend – Thanks, Microsoft, on Venture Beat VB, by Jordan Novet, May 1, 2015;
Canada: Or, a budget that loves all Manitobans, on Winnipeg Free Press, by Kate Kehler and Josh Brandon, May 1, 2015;
David Cameron pledges to add £1,000 to pensioners’ income within five years, on Mail Online, by Daniel Martin, May 1 2015;
What a radical Conservative government could do, on FT magazine, by Tim Harford, May 1, 2015;
Baltimore: Race, Class and Uprisings, on teleSUR english, by Bill Fletcher jr, April 30, 2015: In the absence of a clear vision or direction in which to channel one’s anger, any direction becomes the direction;
Tous marteaux du Soudan, dans Dune, le 30 avril 2015 … Fin mars, dix-neuf heureux plongeurs ont fait un beau voyage… Embarqués sur le Nemo pour une croisière Sud Soudan, ils ont passé une semaine à plonger en compagnie d’un guide exceptionnel …;
Télé-déclaration sociale des revenus des indépendants avant le 9 juin 2015, dans Net-Iris.fr, par Carole Girard-Oppici, le 30 avril 2015;
RELEASE: Separating Fact from Fiction in Programs that Help Struggling Families, on Center for American Progress.org, by Liz Bartolomeo, April 29, 2015;
The Beginning of the End: Case Could Halt Lethal Injections in US, on Spiegel Online International, by Markus Feldenkirchen, April 29, 2015 (Photo Gallery): Following a string of horrific botched executions, the US Supreme Court is considering a case that could lead to a ban on lethal injections. The alternatives are so cruel that they might bring the country closer to abolishing capital punishment …;
Putin wages a quiet revolution during his time off, on Reseau International.net, by Crimson Alter (first on PolitRussia), April 3, 2015 – translated by Kristina Rus;
These Things Can Change, on Dollars & Sense, real world economics, by DAVID BACON & ROSARIO VENTURA, March-April 2015;
Victory Day - special page about victory over the nazi regime, on Russia Today RT;
CrossTalk, RT’s flagship program – special page on Russia Today RT;
Website: Commons Transition, policy proposals and ideas to implement a Socuak Knowledge Economy;
West wants to end confrontation with Russia over Ukraine – EU foreign policy chief, on Russia Today RT, Dec 29, 2014;
Le chef de la fausse révolution libyenne admet que Kadhafi n’a pas tué de manifestants, dans Réseau International.net, le 23 mai 2014 – no equivalent text found in english; (see also:
- Can a brutal murder be classified as a manifestation of justice? on Think Dream Believe, Oct 20, 2011;
- Details on the cyber revolt in Lybia and the role of the revolutionary media cells, on P2P Foundation, by Michel Bauwens, Feb 28, 2011;
- on en.wikipedia: Libyan Civil War (2011); Libyan Civil War (2014–present); International reactions to the death of Muammar Gaddafi; Template: Libyan Civil War detailed map – May 2, 2015).