Maintaining the supremacy of the financial oligarchy

Published on Real-World Economics Review Blog, by Editor, Dec 20, 2014.

Let’s assume that there is a financial oligarchy which exerts strong political influence due to the vast amounts of money it controls. Let’s further assume that this financial oligarchy has succeeded in having financial markets deregulated and that this has enabled the financial industry to expand their business massively. Then, in some near or far future, their artfully constructed financial edifice breaks down, because it cannot be hidden any more that the accumulated claims cannot be serviced by the real economy. That might be due, for example, to millions of people having bought overly expensive houses on credit without having the income necessary to service this debt. This is the kind of situation we are interested in … //

… However, the economic mainstream itself will have lost credibility due to its obvious failure to promote the public good and its rather obvious alliance with the interests of the financial oligarchy. Students will not so gullibly trust their professors and their textbooks any more. Young and bright researchers, who have not yet invested too much into the old discredited theories and methods, might turn to the question of how the financial industry can be made to serve the public interest. This would contribute to turning public opinion against the interest of the financial oligarchy. Thus, it will be important for the financial oligarchy to identify the brightest and most influential critics and leading figures of reform initiatives and to neutralize them.

This can best be done by putting yourself at the forefront of the movement. This requires money, notoriety and credibility. Money is available most plentifully to the financial industry. Many of their representatives are also well known to the public and command a lot of respect because of their spectacular financial success. Credibility, however, is in short supply. It can fairly easily be acquired, though. One of the more famous representatives of the financial oligarchy would have to publicly criticize economics for failing to prevent disaster and also the dealings of their own breed. The failure of economics and the financial industry will have become so obvious to the public already that an industry representative who acknowledges them will gain a lot of credibility without saying much that is not widely discussed already.

After the chosen representative of the financial oligarchy has gained a big public profile in the media, he might found an institute that is dedicated to the renewal of economics. He should provide the institute with very large funds, at least relative to what other initiatives with the same goal can command. Relative to the profits of the financial oligarchy the required sums are negligible.

If the financial oligarchy can get this together, they have almost secured the power to define what will be regarded as viable new theories and methods and what is to be disregarded as outlandish deviations from scientific common sense. They will be able to make sure that only those kinds of new thinking take hold which do not fundamentally challenge the supremacy of the financial oligarchy.

(full text).

Economy Related Links:

Other Links:

Knee-jerks after Peshawar, on Geopolitical Analysis, by K.N. Pandita, Dec 21, 2014;

on Gesundheit – Santé – Health, Dec 21, 2014;
2014-12-21: about FOOD; http://es.world-citizenship.org/wp-archive/1747
2014-12-21: MODE D’EMPLOI POUR LE KEFIR DE LAIT; http://es.world-citizenship.org/wp-archive/1756
2014-12-21: Les crampes musculaires; http://es.world-citizenship.org/wp-archive/1764

on Gesundheit – Santé – Health, Dec 21, 2014:

Zur Annäherung zwischen den USA und Kuba, Lehren aus der Geschichte, auf de.WSWS.org, von Bill van Auken und David North, 20. Dezember 2014 … Für die Arbeiterklasse und die sozialistische Bewegung gilt es wichtige Lehren aus der kubanischen Erfahrung zu ziehen … // … Einer solchen leichtfertigen Gleichsetzung der sozialistischen Revolution mit Verstaatlichungen durch kleinbürgerliche Kräfte hatte Leo Trotzki bereits lange vor der kubanischen Revolution ausdrücklich widersprochen. Nachdem das Kreml-Regime 1939 im Zuge seines (mit Hitler vereinbarten) Einmarsches in Polen Enteignungen durchgeführt hatte, schrieb Trotzki: „Das politische Hauptkriterium für uns ist nicht die Änderung der Eigentumsverhältnisse in diesem oder jenem Gebiet, wie wichtig sie an sich auch sein mag, sondern vielmehr die Veränderung im Bewusstsein und in der Organisation des Weltproletariats, das Verbessern seiner Fähigkeit, frühere Errungenschaften zu verteidigen und neue zu erobern …;

Imperialism and the ruble crisis, on WSWS.org, by , 18 Dec 2014;

Putin Q&A 2014 (FULL PRESSER), 219.39 min, uploaded by RT, Dec 18, 2014;

Psaki misspoke: Obama not yet signed new anti-Russian bill, 0.30 min, uploaded by RT, Dec 17, 2014;

The power of believing that you can improve, on TEDtalks, with Carol Dweck (also on YouTube, 10.24 min, uploaded by TED, Dec 17, 2014);

The Fukushima Endgame: The Radioactive Contamination of the Pacific Ocean, on Global Research.ca, by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Dec 17, 2014;

The Seville Statement on Violence, on Current Concerns (first on UNESCO), Dec 9, 2014;

… and this:

… und noch dies:

Comments are closed.